Maelstrom Posted March 28, 2025 Report Posted March 28, 2025 Just answering your questions. You don't have to be snarky about it.
Dark Thoughts Posted March 28, 2025 Report Posted March 28, 2025 I'm not snarky, I'm just explaining the discrepancy of understanding here. You don't have to be offended by it.
Lemonspray55555 Posted March 28, 2025 Report Posted March 28, 2025 I had a gut feeling that the deeper the pit the more efficient so I deepened my 2 by 8 pit 10 down at its lowest but at 5 down I added a packed dirt "door" to my basement and the bottom spirals like a stair down. So far I am not sure if I was correct but what I do know is that the resulting charcoal is uneven and sometimes slides and falls disappearing still I get hundreds of charcoal. Maybe someone need only to make a few 11 block test charcoal stair pits.
Lemonspray55555 Posted March 31, 2025 Report Posted March 31, 2025 I did some tests with stair case pits, I think it supports my belief that deeper is more efficient but their are outliers. ^ In this image I would note that aside from max depth the deeper areas are most efficiently converted. ^ In the 2 leftmost pits the peak at 2nd most depth lost less than 4 layers of charcoal compared to the shallows left of incomplete pit which consistently halved. 2
Dilan Rona Posted April 1, 2025 Report Posted April 1, 2025 tried a massive 11x11x11 charcoal pit. with the firepit fire ignited at top. Only 11x11x10 of the wood stacks turned to charcoal, leaving the bottom most wood layer untouched, and unburned.
Lemonspray55555 Posted April 2, 2025 Report Posted April 2, 2025 The initial fire place counts as part of the 11*11*11 bounds, also I found out that charcoal flows in this image I set the fire in the bottom and it filled with charcoal so you don't need to place the fire above the firewood e.g F = firewood X = starting fire. FFX instead of X FFF FFF 3
Broccoli Clock Posted April 2, 2025 Author Report Posted April 2, 2025 @Lemonspray55555 you get some hearts just for taking this to the extremes! I was only posing a general question in my first post, but fair play to you for extrapolating and with images too! 1
NateDatKat Posted June 9, 2025 Report Posted June 9, 2025 Id actually wager to say 2x2s are the least efficient due to the auto waste of 4 firewood for the fire on top, and that being a higher percent to the total of your firewood, would make it a fair bit less efficient per firing then a max 11x11 (I like my 4X4X4 but am going to do a big upgrade to 10x10x10 so I don’t have to fire it up for a long while)
Recommended Posts