Jump to content

Tree branches?


Go to solution Solved by LadyWYT,

Recommended Posts

Posted

If they decide to rework all the trees, maybe. But I'm guessing probably not. The tree models we have now work well enough, and I would also say they stand out a bit from Minecraft trees due to the more detailed textures and variety of tree shapes.

The fruit trees, however, do have branches, and their appearance changes a little more dramatically with the seasons. As to why other trees don't work like this--I presume it's mostly due to the processing power it would require to simulate the loss/regrowth of all those leaves.

Posted
1 hour ago, LadyWYT said:

The fruit trees, however, do have branches, and their appearance changes a little more dramatically with the seasons. As to why other trees don't work like this--I presume it's mostly due to the processing power it would require to simulate the loss/regrowth of all those leaves.

The fruit trees are new right? Or newer? Maybe they could be an indicator other trees will follow suite in having branches. Beats me though. 

  • Solution
Posted
11 minutes ago, Josiah Gibbonson said:

The fruit trees are new right? Or newer? Maybe they could be an indicator other trees will follow suite in having branches. Beats me though. 

I think they were added in 1.16, and given how different they are from "regular" trees I wouldn't say they're a precursor to a tree overhaul. It's always possible, I suppose, but not likely.

Posted

I have no real strong feelings one way or the other. I'm inclined to think it would be CPU intensive to be adding updates to that many trees to the tasklist, but if not, fine.

Should be relatively easy to check. Turn the forestation to 0, and the fruit trees to whatever it takes to make a forest and see.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.