-
Posts
4552 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
204
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
News
Store
Everything posted by LadyWYT
-
I wouldn't zoom the player out into an overhead view of the kingdom area; I'd implement some sort of map table instead. When you interact with the table, it brings up an interface with a small model of the settlement, along with a list of options to make managing some things a little easier.
-
Windmills should take damage if allowed to spin too quickly
LadyWYT replied to Teh Pizza Lady's topic in Suggestions
You know, generally I argue against things like windmill maintenance, as it seems like it would be aggravating to need to check it fairly often or to come back from an expedition and have things falling apart. However, if there's prior warning like squeaky parts, so the player has more time to react, that seems fair. Plus upon further thought about the concepts laid out in this thread...applying brakes to stop your machines ought to stop them from wearing out if they aren't running, which also feels like a very fair implementation of a maintenance mechanic. Maintenance can still be a bit time-consuming, when a player has to do it, but the player can also cut down on the amount of maintenance they need to do and how often, by simply applying the brakes when the machinery isn't in use. I'm more inclined to support that kind of mechanic with that sort of implementation. -
There used to be a couple of Minecraft mods for that kind of thing, back in the day: Tales of Kingdoms and Ancient Warfare. The former dove heavily into RPG aspects(though was never finished, to my knowledge), while the latter was less about RPG mechanics and more about the player creating infrastructure and NPCs to manage. There are probably a handful of other mods that do similar, at for Minecraft, but it's an area that's still being explored on the modding side of Vintage Story.
-
I dunno about for seas/oceans, but if rivers are ever implemented, that does sound like it could be an interesting mechanic as a local challenge. A player could avoid that kind of trouble by not building in the obvious floodplain. In the event they really want to build in such an area though, then building structures like dams or dikes would allow them to do so. Not really sure about this one, but if it just cracks a few blocks instead of destroying things, and you can fix it with some clay/other materials, then it sounds like it might be fair. Though I would expect it to be an optional challenge that's toggled off by default, much like lightning starting fires. Given how destructive tornadoes are, I really don't see them being a thing, outside of mods. I like this idea, but without the destruction. Most meteors aren't that big and burn up in the atmosphere, which would make for some fun stargazing activity at night(especially if there are meteor showers at certain times of year). It would also be cool to find a chunk of meteoric iron every once in a while, from the rare fresh meteor. As for the meteors big enough to leave craters, I think the craters we already have is enough. I'm not sure how easy it would be to code all of these into a mod, as coding is not my area of expertise. However, one really great thing about Vintage Story is that it's designed to be easy to mod, in terms of both playing with mods and creating them. So even if you don't have prior experience with creating mods, it's a good place to start learning.
-
I just went through a heavy temporal storm...only got around 16 flax fibers and a couple of rusty gears for my efforts, despite killing around 20 or so monsters. No specials. It's the kind of drops I'd expect for passive scavenging loot post-storm with this kind of rebalance, but not from a storm where I'm really putting in the effort to get my goodies. With the proposed kill tracker I could have had at least one or two special monsters and gotten some better stuff. Oh well!
-
Generally, I advocate for natural disasters to be a mod, and not part of the vanilla game. Things like tornadoes, floods, earthquakes and the like would certainly be a challenge, however...they also destroy player bases without much option for counterplay. Chiselwork takes quite a bit of time and effort, as does livestock domestication, fruit trees, and various other things--to have that wiped out by something you couldn't prevent/avoid isn't going to be fun for most. That being said, something like the blizzard idea you've laid out is an exception, as it adds more challenge, but also plenty of counterplay options. Players could stockpile more firewood/other fuel to keep warm, shovel snow out of the way, or build bases with plenty of covered area so the snow doesn't accumulate in work spaces. Likewise, as a seasonal challenge a player can know roughly when to expect such storms to occur, giving them time to prepare, and the storms aren't destructive either so there's no worries about losing chiselwork or other valuable efforts.
-
Welcome to the forums! I like it. It would add a seasonal challenge, as well as add a sort of "natural disaster" type of event without being too punishing, though I don't think I would freeze the water deeper than one block. I don't live in a place that gets a lot of snow, but I've sometimes wondered why the snow isn't able to drift a bit higher in the game. Or at least, why snow accumulation doesn't vary a bit over the winter. As for Tennessee summers and Southern summertime in general...it's not the heat that's the problem, as much as it is the humidity. It locks in the heat, as well as the cold(assuming it ever decides to actually be wintertime ).
-
Do whatever you need to do. You and the rest of the team at Anego have done a great job so far! I'm happy with the money I spent on the game, and look forward to what else you guys are cooking up.
- 210 replies
-
- 13
-
-
-
Because you never know when a gaggle of dwarves and an old wizard man will show up at your door asking you to be their burglar.
-
Especially if we can be the dragons and pester those pesky dwarves for a proper Smaug experience. I really like this, as it's something I'd like to do in Vintage Story, but doesn't really fit the story or the lore. Which is perfectly fine! That is, after all, what modding is for, and if that kind of gameplay is added as a whole new gamemode/game with its own lore...well, then I can have my cake and eat it too!
-
My 3 weeks suggestion list & big thanks to the devs
LadyWYT replied to Phantom72's topic in Suggestions
OH! Okay yeah that makes a lot more sense. Not something I had considered for adding to the game, but it sounds rather interesting and useful, so...why not? You could probably make it a toggle like the "immersive first person" mode, so that players can choose which option they prefer. In the meantime, someone did implement the concept via mod: https://mods.vintagestory.at/freelook -
This is probably what you're looking for: https://mods.vintagestory.at/tailorsdelight
-
You are correct in that the cementation furnace needs 2 full piles of coal underneath the stone coffin in order to function(I think 3 refills is accurate as well, though it could be 4). However, you need charcoal or coke inside the coffin; black coal isn't a high enough quality to carbonize the iron ingots. For the fuel underneath the coffin though, any type of coal works. Personally, I use brown coal when I can, as it's easier to find than black coal or anthracite and doesn't require as much work to acquire en masse, unlike charcoal or coke. For a beehive kiln...honestly, I dunno on that one. I've not messed with them that much, and never done the math on the fuel costs. I just throw a few piles of firewood or peat underneath the kiln and call it a day; those fuels are easy enough to amass in quantity that I don't really mind wasting a bit in order to ensure the kiln fires in one attempt.
-
Personally I think the temporal storms are fine as-is. However, it's a subject that frequently gets brought up here on the forums, so I thought I'd take a crack at a rebalance that offers a bit more flexibility in terms of choice. With the current storms, the two main choices are either play it safe and get nothing, or go fight and get some loot(which really isn't a good idea in the early game). My goal with this rebalance was to make early game storms less of a hassle(you get a handful of useful things to scavenge if you play it safe), while making later storms more rewarding once you're equipped(you get more and better loot for being a good monster hunter). I generally look at temporal storms as a sort of giant rift, where the barrier between the Rust world and reality becomes very thin. Given the state of a certain spoiler location, it seems plausible that some odds and ends could be dropped by monsters before they disappear back to the Rust world(or wherever they came from). Nope, just speaking from my general experience. I've had some storms where special monsters practically spawned on top of each other, and other storms where I've not seen a single special monster no matter how many other monsters I killed. Generally, I only see one special monster per storm, regardless of my kill count, so it doesn't seem to be something currently influenced by the number of monsters a player kills. Right, hence why I said the average loot for post-storm scavenging is a handful of flax fibers and the odd couple of rusty gears or metal scraps. Stuff that's still useful, but nothing particularly rare unless you get incredibly lucky. To get things like temporal gears or Jonas parts with any kind of regularity or within a reasonable time frame, you'll need to take a risk and actually go fight the monsters during the storm, instead of waiting it out safely in a bunker. The better you fight, the better your reward.
-
1. Monsters drop loot when they despawn at the end of a storm. The loot acts similar to dropped items, in that it only lasts for a short time before it despawns. Likewise, if a player leaves the area, the loot will also despawn in order to avoid cluttering up the world. Players will need to do their scavenging immediately after a storm in order to collect this loot. Possible loot is the same as what players can get by killing monsters(with metal scrap added as a potential drop), however, certain drops(like Jonas parts) are much more rare. The average loot one could expect just from post-storm scavenging is a handful of flax fibers, a couple of rusty gears, a couple of metal scraps, and the rare temporal gear if they're lucky. As for Jonas parts, they can drop, but the player shouldn't be finding more than one or two per year if they're relying purely on post-storm scavenging. The main idea behind this change is to keep the temporal storms as the unnatural disasters that they should be, while still offering some reward for players who aren't yet equipped to deal with them, or that prefer a more passive playstyle, without feeling like they're being punished for not risking their lives. Rusty gears are good for purchasing necessities from traders, while metal scraps make improvised weaponry a more attractive choice for the early game. The passive loot should also help point new players towards interacting with the storms once they have better equipment, in hopes of better loot, instead of being a pure obstacle to progress. I also figure a change like this would help encourage more passive players to try playing with temporal storms enabled and enjoy part of the challenge, when they might otherwise disable the mechanic entirely. 2. Killing a certain number of monsters in a storm will guarantee a special monster spawn. By this I mean that if a player kills something like 10 monsters(the tier or type of monster doesn't matter), then a special monster(double-headed drifter, deepslit shiver, etc) is guaranteed to spawn nearby. Special monsters will still be a random rare spawn, however, this change gives the player the incentive to participate in the storms and kill as many monsters as they can in order to have more chances at rare loot(Jonas parts, temporal gears) in addition to getting more mundane loot drops(flax fibers, rusty gears, metal scrap). In order to keep it balanced and avoid encouraging things like mob grinders, the killing blow must be from a player(or player pet/follower) in order to count towards the special monster spawn. For multiplayer instances, it doesn't matter which player lands the killing blow--all legitimate monster kills add to the kill counter, making working as a team a very lucrative prospect. The guaranteed special spawns will spawn near one of the players who landed a killing blow, helping to ensure that the special monsters actually spawn near the players trying to fight them and not the ones just waiting out the storm. As for servers where players are more spread out and operating independently...I'm not really sure how to balance this mechanic for that scenario, other than maybe adding an optional server configuration to make the kill counter specific to individual players instead of counting kills as a collective. In any case, the main idea with this change is to offer a better reward for players who are willing to risk their lives in the temporal storms. They'll still be able to scavenge loot from the monsters that despawn after the storm, of course, but will have much more, better loot than if they had just safely waited out the storm in a bunker. 3. Monsters can drop metal scraps as loot. As stated before, it seems like a fitting drop, and helps make scrap weapons a more attractive choice as an early-mid game weapon. Otherwise, I didn't want to touch the loot tables too much, since the current offerings feel fair, and will be a lot more exciting once late game tech receives an update. TL;DR: Passive players can scavenge some loot after temporal storms, so they don't feel punished for choosing safer options with the mechanic enabled. Players who risk their lives in the storms and fight well are rewarded for that risk with better loot, and more of it.
-
I've never cared to do the math on it either. I just know that by the time I'm able to collect bushmeat in large quantities, I'm also able to do the same for redmeat, which is much better quality. So the nutrient loss from letting the bushmeat rot isn't really a concern.
-
Welcome to the forums! They function the same. You just need to make sure the slab is flush to the inside of the greenhouse, and not the outside, in order for it to function. There's no functional advantage to it; at that point, it's a purely aesthetic choice.
-
Typically I just let it rot, and then turn it into compost. If I happen to be playing with Expanded Foods, then I'll sometimes turn it into stew or pemmican, but it still generally ends up getting left to rot for compost.
-
Hmmm...good question. My best rough guess is around 15-20 blocks, maybe 30 but I think that's pushing it. Shivers and bowtorn are a little easier to notice, as they make harsher noises than drifters do. In any case, I don't think you'll need to dig very far in order to find whatever cave they're lurking in.
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
My 3 weeks suggestion list & big thanks to the devs
LadyWYT replied to Phantom72's topic in Suggestions
Unless I'm mistaken, I believe this feature is being included in the next update. This is one of those suggestions that I'm not entirely sure about. However, it seems to be a common suggestion from new players, so I think it's worth a look. I know that if you look up an item, it will have all the recipes it's used to craft listed under it. Or at least, most of them. I've seen a few mods that implement this concept. The usual solution seems to be allowing the player to sacrifice temporal gears in order to get more lives. In my opinion it's better left as a mod rather than an addition to the vanilla game. As @Zane Mordien says, this is currently being worked on. I'm assuming this is for third-person? Or something else? I don't play in third-person myself, but it would be nice to have a better third-person mode for those that enjoy playing like that. Also, welcome to the forums! It's always fun to see new player reactions. -
Honestly, I could see an elevator being added as a more elaborate Jonas tech contraption. You could power the thing with temporal gears, or perhaps a steam engine should steam power be added.
-
You won't have an interface when you pop a bloom onto the anvil, since the only output is an ingot. Like any metal, you will need to heat the bloom/ingots to a workable temperature(which varies depending on the metal) in order to smith it into anything useful, which also means you'll need tongs to handle it. As for how many bangs it takes to reach the final product...I've not counted to get an exact number, but it does take several hits. The best time to use a helve hammer is in a strong wind, as that ensures it'll finish tasks in a timely manner, without a need to reheat the work item.
-
It's been that way since at least 1.18, which is when I first started playing. Helve hammers are fairly simple--you use them to refine iron/steel blooms into ingots, or to hammer ingots into plates. When you pop an ingot onto the anvil, it will still give you the choice to start making something else, but if you select anything aside from "plate" it's not going to work.
-
Agreed! This is what I tend to do, since brown coal is more easily found than black coal or anthracite(I don't know if this works for steel production), and doesn't take as much work as charcoal burning. And yeah, adding more blocks of fuel won't make it go faster. Two piles of fuel is the maximum you can have, because the piles need to be burning directly under the stone coffins in order to actually accomplish the refining process.
- 3 replies
-
- steel
- steemaking
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
She did an excellent job! Somehow it manages to be super cozy and yet scare the pants off me at the appropriate times. I also don't recall seeing anything else quite like it, which really helps Vintage Story stand out from its competitors. These right here are two big reasons I'm not worried about Vintage Story's development. The devs aren't just there for a paycheck or having to answer to corporate; it's a project they put their hearts and souls into, because it's something they too want to play. And the effort really shows each update! I can't recall seeing anything low-quality, even with all the growing pains of the last update(1.20).