LadyWYT

In fairness, I think they are even rarer now than they were before, thanks to some tweaks to the lunar cycles. Previously, they would happen roughly a couple times per year in the spring and the fall, and did not take the moon's phase into account. Now the eclipses should only be happening with a new moon that is close enough to cover the sun completely(partial coverage is possible but produces no visible effects).

Probably the same way that most bugs slip through testing into the main release. Sometimes, there are certain things you just don't think to try when you're attempting to check code function. You might be. It's not something I use as I find the current animations jarring with it turned on, as well as the fact that IFP makes it harder to build(held blocks are in the way). I can't recall having ever seen anyone else mention using it either, so I do find it likely that it's a very niche thing at this time.

Speaking of smithing, it looks like we're going to be getting some proper tempering mechanics next update. While I don't expect to get new weapons, I think it'll make the weapons we currently have more interesting since the player can have some control over specific properties. A sword with more durability will last longer before it breaks, but make require an extra hit or two to kill an opponent since the softer metal can't hit as hard. A sword with a harder temper might do more damage and thus be more efficient at killing enemies, but that damage boost comes at the cost of the weapon having a lower durability.

That's got to be a bug. If I'm recalling correctly, the player's riding animation recently got some tweaks to adjust the seat, so I'm guessing that IFP probably wasn't appropriately accounted for when making those adjustments.

To my knowledge it's just a factor of temperature. Areas that are warm enough will have it, while colder areas won't. Temperature is a little finicky in that it does vary from block to block, though not enough that it will be inconsistent for the chunk as a whole. It's how you can have some crop tiles get damaged by the cold but have adjacent tiles of the same crop type be unaffected, I think. As for exact calculations, that I don't know.

The way I look at it is that it's perfectly fine to share an opinion without being willing to discuss it or otherwise have a change of mind. However, sharing said opinion on a public forum makes it fair game for discussion. Where it starts to really be a problem, is when said opinion is getting relentlessly shoved at other posters without any sort of counter-argument or willingness to discuss why it may/may not be a good idea. Pretty much. I would say even some of the worst takes can be taken seriously, as long as the poster making them is open to polite(or at least, relatively civil) discussion with everyone else. Even in the event that no agreement is reached, there's at least a decent list of pros and cons about the different ideas. Just my two cents here, but in my experience it's not unusual for combat suggestions to tip the game into "combat simulator" territory, as Valheim and other games explicitly focused on combat often get cited as examples of what VS combat should be. Not all combat suggestions are like that, mind you, but many do seem to come from players who seem to want primarily combat and don't really care about the other things the game has to offer. My general opinion on VS combat is that I would rather see small changes implemented first, like a status effect system and herbalism(poisons) as well as some hitbox/animation tuning, and see how those changes affect the overall balance before resorting to more drastic measures like reworking the entire system from the ground up. The simpler "point and click" system we have now also makes it very easy to jump right into the game and start playing decently well, regardless of whether the player is brand new or a veteran that just hasn't played in a while. However, there's also enough nuance that the player can still tailor their equipment to better fit their given situation; that is, plate armor is good for base defense, but not for adventuring. Gambeson is great for adventuring, but not so good for venturing deep underground. Spears do the most damage at range but bows can shoot farther and are more efficient on inventory space. It's not quite the other block game's kind of simple where the player just dons diamond/netherite, picks a weapon, and then calls it a day.

Ah, I see. Unfortunately that's not the impression I got from reading your initial post. But that clarification makes a lot more sense, and with a closer examination makes sense to add to the game as well.

Poor/Very Poor deposits aren't the ideal places to dig, but if those are all you have to work with it doesn't hurt to try either. The density search will only list what likely spawned there, not what actually did. As for percentage readout, I tend to ignore that unless I'm trying to find an exact dig spot. For tin specifically, it's a fairly common ore that occurs in small deposits, so the percentage reading is often rather low. Since it's a common ore, it's usually somewhat easy to find, even at poor readings.

I value my time as well, but I also value my inventory space. The last thing I want is my inventory getting crammed full of some resource the game arbitrarily decided was so important that it just picked it up for me. Loose items are one thing, but I'd rather be the one making the decision on what I pick up or otherwise interact with in the world, as I am the one that's playing the game. Pretty much. I would also say that streamlining gameplay is one reason that the other block game gets reamed as hard as it does sometimes. Still a great game, in my opinion, but there's practically no meat to it outside of building/redstone, as the game will almost play itself for you. As others have already said, you don't need wind power, and how much flint it takes depends entirely on how much fire clay you need. Eight flint will make a stack of fire clay; all you have to do is calcinate the flint in a firepit, grind it into powder, and then mix the powder with red/blue clay. If you're near a bauxite biome, you can try looking for fire clay deposits, as they will spawn naturally here sometimes. You can also try searching under seams of black coal or anthracite, though there is no guarantee of finding a deposit here. Cracked vessels will sometimes contain a bit of fire clay as well. As for traders...I'm not sure if some of them sell it or not, but it probably doesn't hurt to check with your friendly local building traders or others that you think might carry it. As for the reasoning behind the changes, my assumption is that the change was made to make the early game a bit more meaningful. Prior to the change it was very easy to jump straight to the endgame stuff and skip most of the early tech; now the player actually needs to invest in a copper anvil and chisel(usually, but not always) if they want to get early access to the bread oven and glass.

You shouldn't need to crouch to place the dough--it should be as simple as right-clicking on the table with the dough. Otherwise, I don't see reports of this issue in the mods' comments, however, do keep in mind that both mods are still in development for 1.21 and do not yet have stable releases, and therefore likely to have issues. If you are using other mods in addition to these ones, it could also be interference from a different mod, and not the fault of one of these two.

Odd. There should have been an email with the key. Did you check your spam box to make sure it didn't end up there somehow? Otherwise, I have no idea.

Either that, or the health bar is shrinking a bit due to other nutrition going down. One easy way to find out, potentially, is that if OP is actually taking damage, there should be information related to what kind of damage it is listed in the Damage info tab. Given that the OP is holding tongs in the offhand, it's possible he could've stepped on a fire/molten metal while eating, and mistaken that for the stew causing problems.

It's also very similar to another term that also rolls off the tongue easily--a term that I won't be repeating here, but it aptly describes the situation the player finds themselves in when they encounter one of these things. I do agree here, but a drop rate that is too high can also make the item feel rather cheap. Diamonds in the other block game suffer from this problem; they're very valuable and the first set of diamond gear the player acquires feels awesome...until the player figures out just how easy it is to acquire diamonds en masse. Also agreed. I'm not even sure if most players are really aware of what they can craft with the Jonas parts. That is a risk, for sure, but to use the base return teleporter as an example I'm not sure that kind of consumable is meant to be used frequently. That item in particular is best used for an expedition to the tropics or other very long exploration mission where you don't want to have to travel all the way back home. The drawback, of course, is that the item is expensive and requires the player to travel on foot, but if it's a trip you're only going to make once or twice it's not as big of a deal. Also agreed. I think the temporal gear drop rate is probably fine, but the Jonas parts will probably need to have the drop rates tweaked, or otherwise have certain NPCs sell for, as a certain gem-obsessed bear would say, a "small fee".

Welcome to the forums! Did you by chance break your shovel during this process? And are you playing with mods that could be affecting tool behavior, or blocks like sand and gravel? The reason I ask is that sometimes there is goofy behavior when tools break, that can result in "ghost items" and behavior similar to what you're describing. However, in my experience that kind of thing tends to happen more often when clayforming(when you run out of clay and try to use a new stack) or chiseling(chisel breaks but can sometimes briefly reappear as a ghost item). In the case of ghost items, a quick relog typically fixes it. If a mod is causing the issue though, you'll need to do some additional testing to figure out the culprit. The general method is to disable all your mods, ensure that vanilla works properly, and then re-enable them one by one, testing as you do so.

To my knowledge, the spawns for story locations are static, save for the latter location mentioned above. It's why there are always certain monsters in specific places, and why locust spawners in story locations don't spawn hordes of the mechanical menaces. I'm guessing that most story locations are built this way in order to help better illustrate the narrative for that location, while still keeping the challenge for the player reasonable. I'm glad you asked, because I was just fixing to note that before getting to this question. I'm certain that I've seen more than one of those special enemies in a storm, though I would note that only one of each seems to exist at any given time. That is, you can encounter a deepslit shiver and a double-headed drifter at the same time, but not two of the same at once. However, the chances of getting more than one per storm in singleplayer are rather low, and the chances of seeing two specials at once lower than that. As for the chances of getting more than two per storm...I don't think that's even possible in the vanilla game. After seeing that code snippet though I'm going to need to pay more attention to what those shivers are labeled as in the game. I swear the nameplate says "deepslit", but if they're marked as "deepsplit" in the code then perhaps there's a typo that needs reporting.

Welcome to the forums(and the game)! I will note that if you venture too far from natural light or too close to a rift, the game music will stop playing and switch to the appropriate ambience instead. The game music, by default, also does not play all the time, just at certain intervals similar to the music in the other block game. You can change how frequently the music plays in the Settings, however, if you're not hearing any music at all then there's likely an issue somewhere. A fresh install will probably fix it, but make sure to backup your cherished worlds in a separate folder before doing so. As for the hotbar + backpacks being scrollable, check to see if you are sprinting when this occurs. Holding the sprint key and scrolling essentially "unlocks" the entire hotbar, allowing you to scroll over any slot as long as you are holding the sprint key. The missing items, I'm not sure. It could be a mod issue, if you are playing with mods, but it could also be a bug in the vanilla code. If you die and aren't playing with the "keep inventory" rule turned on, do make sure that you pick up your items before quitting, as to my knowledge quitting will cause the dropped items to despawn(at least in singleplayer). You can turn the "keep inventory" rule on at any time after world creation by running the command /worldconfig deathPunishment keep, or off by writing "drop" instead of "keep". You will need to reload the world for the change to take effect.

It's possible to have more than one deepslit shiver or double-headed drifter spawn in a single storm, but it's a rare occurrence. Most of the time, you'll only end up getting one per storm. I will also note that it's possible to find at least one deepslit shiver outside of a temporal storm, but that's a special case. Two is the highest that I've seen for sure, but I want to say that I've been able to obtain more Jonas parts than two from a single storm, at least in multiplayer. In multiplayer, however, you have the advantage of friends to help you mow down the monsters, so the chances of finding the special ones are likely much higher since more monsters are spawning in general(thanks to the higher kill rate). As for finding Jonas parts, I would still consider temporal storms the better method to obtain them rather than the underground, simply because it's much easier to fight in the open spaces on the surface than it is in the cramped underground conditions. Jonas parts in general, I think, are supposed to be rather difficult to come by regardless of how one obtains them. I've never seen one outside of creative mode. To my knowledge, they don't spawn in storms, as I've never seen one there and my friend hasn't mentioned seeing one either the times he's cleaned out the post-storm bowtorn herds with the admin blade(thankfully, such instances don't seem to happen anymore). I've not poked around in the deep underground that much, but the underground in general doesn't seem like the best place to find bowtorn in general. My guess would be that you might find one wandering around in a certain story location, but it's also possible that that particular enemy might not be implemented at the present time. Or perhaps it was meant to be able to spawn, but is currently bugged, similar to how there was a certain mushroom that was in the code but unable to actually spawn during worldgen.

Oh yeah for sure, I was just stating it in overly simplified terms.

Welcome to the forums! This page describes the various options available when it comes to multiplayer hosting: https://www.vintagestory.at/selfhosting/ Which option fits best depends on what kind of experience you're after. I'm guessing the LAN option is what you'll most likely be interested in, but personally I would lean more towards a dedicated server if you're able to go that route. The latter reduces the workload of the machines you actually play the game on, and is probably also the better option if you have other friends that may want to join the game later.

Welcome to the forums(and the game)! Generally when looking for ores, it's best to prospect a wide area(like, a 1000 block radius of spawn or so) and then sink a shaft at the most promising spot. If you're playing with surface tin enabled(which it's enabled by default on Standard/Exploration mode), you can find tin on the surface but it's very rare. Do keep in mind though that while tin(cassiterite) is the most common ore to make a bronze alloy with, you don't actually need tin bronze specifically save for making the pickaxe for the treasure hunter quest. There are two other bronze types that will serve just as well: bismuth bronze and black bronze. Bismuth bronze is an alloy of bismuth, zinc(sphalerite), and copper, while black bronze is an alloy of gold, silver, and copper. Also keep in mind that as long as you're playing with lore content enabled, you can acquire pickaxes and ores from certain traders. Survival Goods carries pickaxes, I think, while Commodities traders will sometimes have ore bits for sale.

Both Vintage Story and Project Glint are being built off the same game engine, which to my knowledge is something custom-built by Anego Studios. So it's easier to copy/paste code from one game to another, with a few tweaks to make sure that said code is integrated well, of course. What that means in terms of development choices though, I don't know. My best guess is that the devs could look at what concepts are working well in Project Glint, and then tweak them a bit to fit Vintage Story, and vice versa. Procedural dungeons and combat are a good example: to my knowledge, Project Glint is supposed to be much more of an RPG-dungeon crawler type game, so those are two important systems that will probably have development priority. Vintage Story is much more focused on exploration and homesteading, so it's more efficient to let the VS team focus on that and borrow from the PG team as needed. Same goes for potential survival mechanics and building in Project Glint--the VS team has done most of the heavy lifting there, so the PG team can take some of what works in VS and apply it to Project Glint. You never know. Mods are a great way to test various ideas, and it's not unheard of for the devs to integrate well-executed mod concepts, provided that said concepts fit the developer vision. For combat specifically though, I think complex combat is better left to mods in most cases, especially when it comes to PvP balancing. That in itself is a nightmare, as it seems there's always stuff that is "too strong", or "too weak", or "the meta is boring and needs to change". What stuff that is varies from player to player. Additionally, balancing the classes would be a nightmare, as what's ideal for PvP doesn't usually work well for what works in PvE content. Of the classes we have, currently there's only two that really work for PvP(in my opinion), and that is Blackguard and Hunter. PvP typically has more variety in terms of class choice, but if more PvP classes were added then what happens is the class list starts getting bloated, with classes that start feeling the same due to overlaps and classes that feel too underwhelming in standard gameplay since they're balanced exclusively for PvP. There's also the nightmare of balancing damage, as if melee is too strong then ranged players will complain, and vice versa. That's also an aspect that directly affects PvE as well, since if there's an option that's clearly better than the others(or perceived as such, anyway) then players will tend to pick that option. Aside from all the above, the other main reason I think mods are better suited for PvP stuff is that mods allow the server owners to tailor the PvP balance to their specific liking. One server can buff ranged damage if they think it's too weak, while another server can easily nerf ranged damage if they feel it's too strong. If a server wants to throw magic into the mix for a high fantasy setting, they can easily do that while servers that prefer a more realistic approach could focus on historical arms/armament and balancing. Basically with mods, everyone can have what they want, as long as they're willing to do a little extra legwork with the initial setup. I wouldn't be opposed to this, as it does feel just a little too easy to throw yourself into reverse. I don't know that I'd want momentum based movement explicitly though, as I like being able to stop on a dime if I'm about to fall in a hole. But slowing down backwards movement feels fitting, and it's not a change that I would expect to hurt building at all. In creative mode, the restriction could be lifted, but in survival it would help prevent the player from backing up too quickly and falling off their build as a result. If you've not tried it, I would recommend taking a look at the Vigor mod. Essentially, it adds a proper "stamina" bar to the game, which limits the duration that the player can sprint(better nutrition will increase stamina). Such a limit means that the player needs to be more careful about exactly when they choose to sprint, as low stamina at a critical moment can be deadly. It also gives much more value to having a mount, since the mount can run freely without such limits. It's another mechanic that I could easily see getting added to the vanilla game, since it adds quite a lot of nuance without actually changing too much.

I'm not going to say you're exactly wrong, as I've not really tested the theory myself, but I don't get the impression that it's correct based on my storm experience. The enemy spawns seem more tied to the strength of the storm itself, as light storms will spawn fewer and heavy storms will spawn more. Storm strength doesn't really seem correlated to enemy strength though, as high tier enemies will still spawn regardless. Stability level I think operates in a similar fashion, in that once it drops low enough monsters will start spawning nearby, but it doesn't seem to affect what strength of monsters will spawn. In any case, the main reason I don't think it's a way to game the system during a storm, is that it takes a while for stability to drop that low, while it's incredibly easy to restore a good chunk of that stability by killing a single nightmare level monster. At best, you're looking at killing maybe 2-3 monsters per storm, which is going to result in much less loot than you would have gotten just by seeing how high you can make the kill counter go. I've not tackled a storm underground, but I've dealt with stability low enough to spawn monsters. It's all fun and games until a trio of nightmare drifters spawn in the tunnel to block the way out. On the surface it wouldn't be much of a concern, but that lack of movement is the real killer.

I'm with @Bruno Willis on this one: it's an idea more appropriate for natural storms or creeks/riverbanks rather than temporal storms. As for resource issues in multiplayer...my general opinion is that resources will always be an issue when it comes to big servers. If there is a convenient option, players will almost always take it without hesitation. You know what, I like it. It fits what we've seen of Rust world breaches in reality, and stuff like rusty gears, metal spikes, and scrap metal is still useful without being too useful, if you get my drift. Rusty gears are always useful for buying stuff, and metal spikes can serve as rudimentary traps. Scrap metal can make dye, scrap weapons, and scrap bombs, and if there was some crude scrap armor the player could fashion that could be yet another early game niche. Pair that with the suggestion @MKMoose made about there being a collectible resource before/after the temporal storms hit, and I think it's an idea that works very well without changing too much about the storms themselves, while getting more use out of existing game assets.

As a general rule, most content creators are going to be after views, but there are some out there that just do whatever they want without worrying about views. In regards to chasing views...there are some things that one would think would be common sense, but simply playing a popular game isn't enough to pull in viewers. The creator in question needs to be interesting to watch, as well as have a relatively high quality video/audio at minimum, especially since the media outlets are so saturated with various creators to watch. That being said, a creator can basically do everything right, and still lose thanks to whatever algorithms are governing what videos/stream actually show up in search results. I'm not saying that's happening, of course, just that it's something to consider. But I do agree with @Thorfinn and @Teh Pizza Lady, it's not unusual at all for content creators to play games that they can easily excel at, or even edit the footage/stage gameplay to make themselves look more skilled than they actually are. I don't have a grove or an arena, but I have been mulling over similar concepts of late when it comes to base design. I'm not really one for building traps or exploiting the enemy AI too much, as to me that feels too cheap to be fun, but I have been in some situations that, while they didn't end in disaster, didn't go all that well due to how I designed my buildings. It's a very good idea to have two different entry points, since having just one is just asking for a pile of monsters to loiter. Having some decorative trees and statues can provide cover from bowtorn, while having alleyways and overhangs can help trip up whatever is trying to chase you. Likewise, having some arrow slits or other ranged vantage points is good for softening up enemies from a distance. As a side note, I've also noticed that while enemies are capable of climbing up ladders, they don't seem to understand how to climb down.

Fair, but I'm looking at from the perspective of, if you dangle a juicy benefit in front of the player, they're going to chase it, especially if it's something that gets perceived as the most optimal way to play. The scenario that therefore unfolds in my mind is that players will take a look at the damage boost that extra muscle gives, strive for it, and then get aggravated when they find out the drawbacks to acquiring/maintaining it. Extra health and inventory space also serve as prime bait. The increased hunger rate is one example I would pick from the drawback. While it doesn't feel exceptionally unreasonable to me, to my knowledge many people will avoid playing the Blackguard class purely due to the increased hunger drain, and that drawback is a much smaller penalty in contrast. In any case, that's mainly why I say it's a great idea for a mod, but probably wouldn't make for a good addition to the base game. I will note that size doesn't always equate to slow movements or slow acceleration. Some of the most dangerous opponents are the big individuals with fast reflexes. In any case, for this particular idea to work, the entire movement system would need to be reworked in order to account for player momentum.